Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/brill/an-appreciative-reply-to-donald-w-dayton-s-review-essay-4vcwb302y9
References
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
- Publisher
- Brill
- Copyright
- © 2005 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
- ISSN
- 0272-0965
- eISSN
- 1570-0747
- DOI
- 10.1163/157007405774270347
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Review Response PNEUMA: The Journal of the Society for Pentecostal Studies, Volume 27, No. 1, Spring 2005 S P S © 2005 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden pp. 163–172 An Appreciative Reply to Donald W. Dayton’s “Review Essay” Laurence W. Wood Don Dayton recently contributed a review essay in this journal which was an extended review of my book, The Meaning of Pentecost in Early Methodism . Dayton was concerned that my work might have been an attempt to refute his book, The Theological Roots of Pentecostalism . I was surprised by this impression, and I would like to reaffirm what I said in my book: “I believe that Dayton’s work, The Theological Roots of Pentecostalism , offers a definitive treatment of the relation between the Wesleyan-Holiness tradition and the emergence of Pentecostalism, and it makes a unique contribution to Pentecostal-Holiness literature.” Dayton is to be congratulated for the clarity that he has given regarding the the- ological roots of Pentecostalism in the Wesleyan tradition. However, I also noted that Dayton’s “subsidiary thesis, that the baptism with the Spirit was not embraced by Wesley and early Methodism in general, cannot be maintained in the light of the historiographical data”
Journal
Pneuma – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 2005