Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

SOME OBSERVATIONS ON KARL-HEINZ SCHWARTE'S 'DIOKLETIAN'S CHRISTENGESETZ'

SOME OBSERVATIONS ON KARL-HEINZ SCHWARTE'S 'DIOKLETIAN'S CHRISTENGESETZ' SOME OBSERVATIONS ON KARL - HEINZ SCHWARTE’S ‘DIOKLETIAN’S CHRISTENGESETZ’ by WINRICH A. LÖHR In 1994, the German historian Karl-Heinz Schwarte published a paper in which he challenged the scholarly consensus according to which the legal basis of the ‘Great Persecution’ consisted in four edicts that had been suc- cessively promulgated during the reign of Diocletian. 1 Schwarte argued that there had been only one edict which prescribed the destruction of the churches and the burning of the holy books and ordered everyone to sacriŽ ce. It was the edict’s intention to destroy Christianity by enforcing mass apostasy. By these drastic measures Diocletian wished to prepare and underpin the smooth transition from the Ž rst to the second tetrarchy. In the following I wish to give a brief outline of Schwarte’s arguments and conclusions, put forward some arguments that question their validity and conclude by sketching a di V erent view. I Schwarte (= Sch.) starts his argument by pointing out that the consen- sus view of Diocletian having issued four edicts is sustained by systemati- cally favouring Eusebius’ account of the persecution over against Lactantius’ © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2002 Vigiliae Christianae 56, 75-95 I am grateful http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Vigiliae Christianae Brill

SOME OBSERVATIONS ON KARL-HEINZ SCHWARTE'S 'DIOKLETIAN'S CHRISTENGESETZ'

Vigiliae Christianae , Volume 56 (1): 75 – Jan 1, 2002

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/some-observations-on-karl-heinz-schwarte-s-diokletian-s-christengesetz-aSHj0gSRId

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© 2002 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0042-6032
eISSN
1570-0720
DOI
10.1163/15700720252984846
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

SOME OBSERVATIONS ON KARL - HEINZ SCHWARTE’S ‘DIOKLETIAN’S CHRISTENGESETZ’ by WINRICH A. LÖHR In 1994, the German historian Karl-Heinz Schwarte published a paper in which he challenged the scholarly consensus according to which the legal basis of the ‘Great Persecution’ consisted in four edicts that had been suc- cessively promulgated during the reign of Diocletian. 1 Schwarte argued that there had been only one edict which prescribed the destruction of the churches and the burning of the holy books and ordered everyone to sacriŽ ce. It was the edict’s intention to destroy Christianity by enforcing mass apostasy. By these drastic measures Diocletian wished to prepare and underpin the smooth transition from the Ž rst to the second tetrarchy. In the following I wish to give a brief outline of Schwarte’s arguments and conclusions, put forward some arguments that question their validity and conclude by sketching a di V erent view. I Schwarte (= Sch.) starts his argument by pointing out that the consen- sus view of Diocletian having issued four edicts is sustained by systemati- cally favouring Eusebius’ account of the persecution over against Lactantius’ © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2002 Vigiliae Christianae 56, 75-95 I am grateful

Journal

Vigiliae ChristianaeBrill

Published: Jan 1, 2002

There are no references for this article.