Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Varia bibliographica

Varia bibliographica Varia bibliographica THE MOTHER-IN-LAW OF ALBERT CHRISTIAENSZ, PRINTER AND BOOK DEALER AT VIANEN In the months of January and February 1566 the government in Brussels went to con- siderable lengths to put an end to the activities of the printer and book dealer Albert Christiaensz of Vianen, who had been in business there since the previous year. As Vianen was the personal property of Hendrik van Brederode, the correspondence concerning this matter naturally had to be conducted through him. The count, however, gave evasive answers, so that in February i56? the case had still not been settled. Indeed, very little of consequence had been done at all. A full account of this affair is to be found in H. de la Fontaine Verwey's well-known study of 'Hendrik van Brederode en de drukkerijen van in which the writer made use of the documents discovered in the last century by the Brussels State Archivist L. P. Gachard and published in the second part of his comprehensive edition of the Correspondance de Guillaume le Taciturne, prince d'Orange.2 In his book Utrecht in 1566 en i56?,3 A. van Hulzen, too, discussed various aspects of the affair. It is my pleasure, therefore, to http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Quaerendo Brill

Varia bibliographica

Quaerendo , Volume 6 (2): 195 – Jan 1, 1976

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/varia-bibliographica-IvVdDTRzzx

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© 1976 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0014-9527
eISSN
1570-0690
DOI
10.1163/157006976X00225
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Varia bibliographica THE MOTHER-IN-LAW OF ALBERT CHRISTIAENSZ, PRINTER AND BOOK DEALER AT VIANEN In the months of January and February 1566 the government in Brussels went to con- siderable lengths to put an end to the activities of the printer and book dealer Albert Christiaensz of Vianen, who had been in business there since the previous year. As Vianen was the personal property of Hendrik van Brederode, the correspondence concerning this matter naturally had to be conducted through him. The count, however, gave evasive answers, so that in February i56? the case had still not been settled. Indeed, very little of consequence had been done at all. A full account of this affair is to be found in H. de la Fontaine Verwey's well-known study of 'Hendrik van Brederode en de drukkerijen van in which the writer made use of the documents discovered in the last century by the Brussels State Archivist L. P. Gachard and published in the second part of his comprehensive edition of the Correspondance de Guillaume le Taciturne, prince d'Orange.2 In his book Utrecht in 1566 en i56?,3 A. van Hulzen, too, discussed various aspects of the affair. It is my pleasure, therefore, to

Journal

QuaerendoBrill

Published: Jan 1, 1976

There are no references for this article.