Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Place of Subjectivity in the Academic Study of Religion: A Response to Craig Martin

The Place of Subjectivity in the Academic Study of Religion: A Response to Craig Martin This paper responds to post-structuralist criticisms of my book, Philosophy and the Study of Religions: A Manifesto, made by Craig Martin. In particular, it defends my realist accounts of human beliefs and of religions as structures that operate, respectively, in human subjectivity and in history, even when they are not named. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Method & Theory in the Study of Religion Brill

The Place of Subjectivity in the Academic Study of Religion: A Response to Craig Martin

Method & Theory in the Study of Religion , Volume 29 (4-5): 7 – Nov 16, 2017

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/the-place-of-subjectivity-in-the-academic-study-of-religion-a-response-nqMvS20wFC

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
Copyright © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0943-3058
eISSN
1570-0682
DOI
10.1163/15700682-12341397
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This paper responds to post-structuralist criticisms of my book, Philosophy and the Study of Religions: A Manifesto, made by Craig Martin. In particular, it defends my realist accounts of human beliefs and of religions as structures that operate, respectively, in human subjectivity and in history, even when they are not named.

Journal

Method & Theory in the Study of ReligionBrill

Published: Nov 16, 2017

There are no references for this article.