The Place of Subjectivity in the Academic Study of Religion: A Response to Craig Martin
The Place of Subjectivity in the Academic Study of Religion: A Response to Craig Martin
Schilbrack, Kevin
2017-11-16 00:00:00
This paper responds to post-structuralist criticisms of my book, Philosophy and the Study of Religions: A Manifesto, made by Craig Martin. In particular, it defends my realist accounts of human beliefs and of religions as structures that operate, respectively, in human subjectivity and in history, even when they are not named.
http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.pngMethod & Theory in the Study of ReligionBrillhttp://www.deepdyve.com/lp/brill/the-place-of-subjectivity-in-the-academic-study-of-religion-a-response-nqMvS20wFC
The Place of Subjectivity in the Academic Study of Religion: A Response to Craig Martin
This paper responds to post-structuralist criticisms of my book, Philosophy and the Study of Religions: A Manifesto, made by Craig Martin. In particular, it defends my realist accounts of human beliefs and of religions as structures that operate, respectively, in human subjectivity and in history, even when they are not named.
To get new article updates from a journal on your personalized homepage, please log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.