Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
V. Lenin
Staat und Revolution : die Lehre des Marxismus vom Staat und die Aufgaben des Proletariats in der Revolution
John Kannankulam (2008)
Autoritärer Etatismus im Neoliberalismus : zur Staatstheorie von Nicos Poulantzas
Friedrich Engels
Die Entwicklung des Sozialismus von der Utopie zur Wissenschaft
Michael Gardiner (2009)
BooK Review: Philosophizing the Everyday: Revolutionary Praxis and the Fate of Cultural Theory, John Roberts (2006). London: Pluto. ISBN 0-745324-11-8. Everyday Life: Theories and Practices From Surrealism to the Present, Michael Sheringham (2006). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-199273-Space and Culture, 12
Hans-Georg Backhaus (2011)
Dialektik der Wertform : Untersuchungen zur Marxschen Ökonomiekritik
L. Althusser (2007)
Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses
(1993)
Critical Theories of the State: Marxist, Neomarxist, Postmarxist
Elmar Flatschart (2008)
Welche Theorie kapitalistischer Entwicklung? Ein Vergleich neomarxistischer Ansätze unter Berücksichtigung des Kritischen Realismus
A. Demirović (2007)
Nicos Poulantzas : Aktualität und Probleme materialistischer Staatstheorie
P. Abrams (1988)
Notes on the Difficulty of Studying the State (1977)Journal of Historical Sociology, 1
W. Müller, Christel Neusüß (1971)
Die Sozialstaatsillusion und der Widerspruch von Lohnarbeit und Kapital, 1
E. Altvater, J. Hoffmann (1990)
The West German State Derivation Debate: The Relation betweeen Economy and Politics as a Problem of Marxist State TheorySocial Text
Abstract The present review essay discusses Peter Bratsis’s work Everyday Life and the State (2006). It is argued that Bratsis produces a sound contribution to the on-going debate on state theory, which has its particular strengths in the innovative treatment of the public-private divide and an elaborate critique of fetishistic and ideological relations in the field of the political. In this, Bratsis builds on a broad range of structuralist, poststructuralist and dialectical positions. Deficiencies of his work are likewise to be found in this bricolage of theoretical approaches: it is argued that conflicting epistemological and ontological fundamentals are not sufficiently taken into account, which consequently leads to reductionist and errant conclusions. This is especially evident in the confusion of ‘structuralist’ and ‘dialectical’ heuristics, which leads to an insufficiently materialist picture of the state in relation to ‘everyday life’.
Historical Materialism – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 2012
Keywords: state theory; state as an object/subject; Poulantzas; state abstraction; fetish of the public; national ideology; everyday life; Althusserian ideology theory; Lefebvrian dialectical approach
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.