Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Levine and Sober: A Rejoinder

Levine and Sober: A Rejoinder Paul Nolan Levine and Sober: A Rejoinder Introduction Wha tever attitude we take towards t he kind o f historical materialism defended by G.A. Cohen, and towards the analytical techniques that he used to defend it, the publication of Karl Marx’s Theory of History represented a watershed in discussion of historical materialism. 1 Cohen propounded a strong, though not unqualiŽed, historical materialism, in which societies undergo a series of changes in form, from pre-class society to precapitalist class society to capitalist society. These changes are (functionally) explained by the propensity of these successive social forms to enhance productive power, given the level of productive power already in existence. 2 The consensus that emerged during the debates t hat fo llow ed the bo o k’s public ation, how ever, was that such an ambitious doctrine could not be sustained. Perhaps under the barrage of criticism that the book received, Cohen himself subsequently developed doubts and reservations about the book’s central claims. 3 Levine’s and Sober ’s ‘What’s Historical Historical Materialism , volume 11:3 (183–200) © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2003 Also available online – www.brill.nl 1 Cohen 1978. 2 Cohen 1988, pp. 3–36. 3 Cohen 1988, pp. 109–79. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Historical Materialism Brill

Levine and Sober: A Rejoinder

Historical Materialism , Volume 11 (3): 183 – Jan 1, 2003

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/levine-and-sober-a-rejoinder-UmkPXnNanx

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© 2003 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
1465-4466
eISSN
1569-206X
DOI
10.1163/156920603770678364
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Paul Nolan Levine and Sober: A Rejoinder Introduction Wha tever attitude we take towards t he kind o f historical materialism defended by G.A. Cohen, and towards the analytical techniques that he used to defend it, the publication of Karl Marx’s Theory of History represented a watershed in discussion of historical materialism. 1 Cohen propounded a strong, though not unqualiŽed, historical materialism, in which societies undergo a series of changes in form, from pre-class society to precapitalist class society to capitalist society. These changes are (functionally) explained by the propensity of these successive social forms to enhance productive power, given the level of productive power already in existence. 2 The consensus that emerged during the debates t hat fo llow ed the bo o k’s public ation, how ever, was that such an ambitious doctrine could not be sustained. Perhaps under the barrage of criticism that the book received, Cohen himself subsequently developed doubts and reservations about the book’s central claims. 3 Levine’s and Sober ’s ‘What’s Historical Historical Materialism , volume 11:3 (183–200) © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2003 Also available online – www.brill.nl 1 Cohen 1978. 2 Cohen 1988, pp. 3–36. 3 Cohen 1988, pp. 109–79.

Journal

Historical MaterialismBrill

Published: Jan 1, 2003

There are no references for this article.