Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
1 Independent on Sunday , 26 December 1999, cited Flett 2000, p. 2. It does not seem to have occurred to Fearn that some sit-in leaders were, if not ‘girls’, at least women. Or perhaps he assumes they were all lesbians. 2 Hamon & Rotman 1987–8. Mai 68, l’héritage impossible J EAN -P IERRE L E G OFF Paris: La Découverte, 1998 68–98, Histoire sans n G ÉRARD F ILOCHE Paris: Flammarion, 2000 Reviewed by I AN B IRCHALL In Britain, it is easy to trivialise the sixties. One Nicholas Fearn recently told readers of the Independent on Sunday that ‘leading sit-ins at the LSE were [sic!] always, one suspects, a good way of impressing the girls’. 1 In France, things look rather different; 1968 formed a whole generation and initiated irreversible changes in French society. Jean-Pierre Le Goff’s book is a thousand kilometres removed from the ungrammatical inanities of a Fearn. Its 465 pages are closely documented and any reader will learn much from it. And yet Le Goff ’s work is striking not so much for what it contains as for what it omits. Le Goff aims not just to study the events of 1968, but
Historical Materialism – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 2002
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.