Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Do variables that affect similar bistable apparent-movement displays result in similar changes in perception?

Do variables that affect similar bistable apparent-movement displays result in similar changes in... Spatial Vision , Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 105– 123 (2003) Ó VSP 2003. Also available online - www.vsppub.com Do variables that affect similar bistable apparent-movement displays result in similar changes in perception? J. TIMOTHY PETERSIK ¤ , AURA R. SCHELLINGER and SADIE L. GEIGER Department of Psychology, Ripon College, P.O. Box 248, Ripon, WI 54971, USA Received 6 November 2001; revised 5 July 2002; accepted 8 July 2002 Abstract —Two bistable apparent-movement displays (i.e. ones that generate two qualitatively different kinds of movement percepts under different conditions) were compared. They were designed to be as similar as possible spatially, and were studied with identical stimulus manipulations to see whether changes in balance between their bistable percepts would be similar. Results show that the two displays had different response characteristics to the same stimulus manipulations. Two models of motion perception that have previously predicted at least one kind of bistable apparent motion were considered in terms of how well they address the current data. As yet, neither model has been shown to predict the motion states and bistable behavior of the two displays studied here. It is concluded that results of the type described here (speciŽ cally, differences http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Spatial Vision (continued as Seeing & Perceiving from 2010) Brill

Do variables that affect similar bistable apparent-movement displays result in similar changes in perception?

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/do-variables-that-affect-similar-bistable-apparent-movement-displays-BDXSxTwCND

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© 2003 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0169-1015
eISSN
1568-5683
DOI
10.1163/15685680360511636
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Spatial Vision , Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 105– 123 (2003) Ó VSP 2003. Also available online - www.vsppub.com Do variables that affect similar bistable apparent-movement displays result in similar changes in perception? J. TIMOTHY PETERSIK ¤ , AURA R. SCHELLINGER and SADIE L. GEIGER Department of Psychology, Ripon College, P.O. Box 248, Ripon, WI 54971, USA Received 6 November 2001; revised 5 July 2002; accepted 8 July 2002 Abstract —Two bistable apparent-movement displays (i.e. ones that generate two qualitatively different kinds of movement percepts under different conditions) were compared. They were designed to be as similar as possible spatially, and were studied with identical stimulus manipulations to see whether changes in balance between their bistable percepts would be similar. Results show that the two displays had different response characteristics to the same stimulus manipulations. Two models of motion perception that have previously predicted at least one kind of bistable apparent motion were considered in terms of how well they address the current data. As yet, neither model has been shown to predict the motion states and bistable behavior of the two displays studied here. It is concluded that results of the type described here (speciŽ cally, differences

Journal

Spatial Vision (continued as Seeing & Perceiving from 2010)Brill

Published: Jan 1, 2003

Keywords: bistability; models of motion perception.; Apparent motion; Ternus

There are no references for this article.