Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Hierarchical Organization, Revisited

Hierarchical Organization, Revisited HIERARCHICAL ORGANIZATION, REVISITED by KEITH NELSON (University of California, Bodega Marine Laboratory, Bodega Bay, California 94923, United States) ABSTRACT Concepts in DAWKINS' (1976) paper on hierarchical organization are reviewed and areas of confusion discussed. The complex singing organization in the song thrush (Turdus philomelos) is analyzed in terms of hierarchical organization and Markov pro- cess which are shown at each level to be perfectly compatible. However, remote con- tingence is shown to be pervasive, and thus song thrush singing organization is ultimately non-Markovian. "Relative hierarchies" or "heterarchy" are contrasted with distributed patterns of activity as models of control. KEY WORDS: behavior, birdsong, Turdus, temporal patterning, Markov chain, hierar- chy, hierarchical organization, heterarchy, distributed control. 1. INTRODUCTION Everything is hierarchically organized. This began to be evident soon after humans felt the need to classify things. It must have been a com- forting thought indeed. Not so comforting is the observation that things seem simultaneously to be arranged non-hierarchically. In this paper I examine ways in which behavior might be hierar- chically organized, and what might constitute convincing evidence for each. Some concepts in DAWKINS' (1976) influential paper entitled "Hierarchical organization: a candidate principle for ethology" are rev3/?yved. Once again http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Netherlands Journal of Zoology (in 2003 continued as Animal Biology) Brill

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/hierarchical-organization-revisited-qHVG7Q8S4u

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© 1989 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0028-2960
eISSN
1568-542X
DOI
10.1163/156854290X00127
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

HIERARCHICAL ORGANIZATION, REVISITED by KEITH NELSON (University of California, Bodega Marine Laboratory, Bodega Bay, California 94923, United States) ABSTRACT Concepts in DAWKINS' (1976) paper on hierarchical organization are reviewed and areas of confusion discussed. The complex singing organization in the song thrush (Turdus philomelos) is analyzed in terms of hierarchical organization and Markov pro- cess which are shown at each level to be perfectly compatible. However, remote con- tingence is shown to be pervasive, and thus song thrush singing organization is ultimately non-Markovian. "Relative hierarchies" or "heterarchy" are contrasted with distributed patterns of activity as models of control. KEY WORDS: behavior, birdsong, Turdus, temporal patterning, Markov chain, hierar- chy, hierarchical organization, heterarchy, distributed control. 1. INTRODUCTION Everything is hierarchically organized. This began to be evident soon after humans felt the need to classify things. It must have been a com- forting thought indeed. Not so comforting is the observation that things seem simultaneously to be arranged non-hierarchically. In this paper I examine ways in which behavior might be hierar- chically organized, and what might constitute convincing evidence for each. Some concepts in DAWKINS' (1976) influential paper entitled "Hierarchical organization: a candidate principle for ethology" are rev3/?yved. Once again

Journal

Netherlands Journal of Zoology (in 2003 continued as Animal Biology)Brill

Published: Jan 1, 1989

Keywords: Turdus; distributed control; birdsong; temporal patterning; heterarchy; hierarchical organization; Markov chain; behavior; hierarchy

There are no references for this article.