Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Waal (1987)
Tension regulation and nonreproductive functions of sex in captive bonobos pan paniscus, 3
Gen'ichi Itani (1990)
Relations between Unit-Groups of Bonobos at Wamba, Zaire: Encounters and Temporary FusionsAfrican Study Monographs, 11
J. Goodall (1986)
The Chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of Behavior
R. Wrangham, F. White (1988)
Feeding Competition and Patch Size in the Chimpanzee Species Pan Paniscus and Pan TroglodytesBehaviour, 105
T. Kano (1992)
The Last Ape: Pygmy Chimpanzee Behavior and Ecology
R. Wrangham (1979)
Sex differences in chimpanzee dispersion
T. Kano (1989)
THE SEXUAL BEHAVIOR OF PYGMY CHIMPANZEES
J. Dahl (1986)
Cyclic perineal swelling during the intermenstrual intervals of captive female pygmy chimpanzees (Pan paniscus)Journal of Human Evolution, 15
G. Idani (1991)
Social relationships between immigrant and resident bonobo (Pan paniscus) females at Wamba.Folia primatologica; international journal of primatology, 57 2
Richard Malenky, E. Stiles (1991)
Distribution of terrestrial herbaceous vegetation and its consumption by Pan paniscus in the Lomako Forest, ZaireAmerican Journal of Primatology, 23
Alison Badrian, Noel Badrian (1984)
Social Organization of Pan paniscus in the Lomako Forest, Zaire
N. Thompson-Handler, Richard Malenky, Noel Badrian (1984)
Sexual Behavior of Pan paniscus under Natural Conditions in the Lomako Forest, Equateur, Zaire
E. Savage-rumbaugh, B. Wilkerson (1978)
Socio-sexual behavior in Pan paniscus and Pan troglodytes: A comparative studyJournal of Human Evolution, 7
Ronald Noë, Frans Waal, J. Hooff (1980)
Types of dominance in a chimpanzee colony.Folia primatologica; international journal of primatology, 34 1-2
<jats:sec><jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>1. Inter-male relationships were compared between two groups of bonobos at Wamba, Zaire, and a group of chimpanzees at the Mahale Mountains, Tanzania. 2. Although distribution of females is much different between the two species, frequencies of affinitive interactions between males (inter-individual proximity and grooming) were similar between the species. 3. By contrast, marked inter-species differences were found in agonistic aspects of male relationships. Such differences could be related to the different estrus patterns of females. 4. Male relationships of both species may have been reflecting the male-bonded strategy which was taken by a common ancestor. Within this framework, males of each species seem to have developed differentiated social tactics for the access to females showing different patterns of distribution and estrus.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
Behaviour – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 1994
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.