Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Povinelli, K. Parks, M. Novak (1992)
Role reversal by rhesus monkeys, but no evidence of empathyAnimal Behaviour, 44
A. Newell, J. Shaw, H. Simon (1958)
Elements of a theory of human problem solving.Psychological Review, 65
J. Goodall (1986)
The Chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of Behavior
William Vaughan (1981)
Giving up the ghostBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 7
R. Byrne, A. Whiten (1992)
Cognitive Evolution in Primates: Evidence from Tactical Deception, 27
V. Dasser, P. Hoyningen-Huene, H. Kummer (1990)
Exploring Primate Social Cognition: Some Critical Remarks1)Behaviour, 112
D. Povinelli, Kurt Nelson, S. Boysen (1992)
Comprehension of role reversal in chimpanzees: evidence of empathy?Animal Behaviour, 43
K. Lorenz (1970)
Studies in animal and human behaviour
R. Byrne, A. Whiten (1991)
Computation and mindreading in primate tactical deception.
William Chase, Herbert Simon (1973)
Perception in chessCognitive Psychology, 4
S. Yoerg, A. Kamil (1991)
Integrating cognitive ethology with cognitive psychology
R. Byrne, A. Whiten (1985)
Tactical deception of familiar individuals in baboons (Papio ursinus)Animal Behaviour, 33
A. Newell (1973)
Human Problem Solving
D. Cheney, R. Seyfarth (1990)
How Monkeys See the World: Inside the Mind of Another Species, Dorothy L. Cheney and Robert M. Seyfarth, 1990. University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. 384 pages. ISBN: 0-226-10245-9. $24.95Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 13
Philip Smith (1988)
Deception: A need for theory and ethologyBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 11
S. Hulse, H. Fowler, W. Honig (1979)
Cognitive Processes in Animal BehaviorAmerican Journal of Psychology, 92
H. Roitblat (1987)
Introduction to comparative cognition
Cecilia Heyes (1993)
Anecdotes, training, trapping and triangulating: do animals attribute mental states?Animal Behaviour, 46
A. Dickinson (1981)
Contemporary Animal Learning Theory
AbstractA formal notation is argued to be useful in representing theories of complex animal behaviour. This "production system" approach, originally derived from artificial intelligence, is explained with a series of examples of tactical deception in primates. These examples are controversial, since they might suggest intentionality and thinking in non-humans, and their interpretation is not straightforward. The ease of representing competing explanations of sophisticated behaviour (for instance those used in behaviourist psychology, animal ethology, and cognitive science) in the single formalism of production systems, may eventually aid a rapprochement between disciplines with interests in the evolution of intelligence.
Behaviour – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 1993
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.