Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
W. Hamilton (1967)
Extraordinary Sex RatiosScience, 156
J. Assem, E. Bruijn (1977)
SECOND MATINGS AND THEIR EFFECT ON THE SEX RATIO OF THE OFFSPRING IN NASONIA VITRIPENNIS (HYMENOPTERA: PTEROMALIDAE)Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 21
J. Assem, F. Putters, G. Simbolotti (1987)
Rates of attack and control of the offspring sex ratio in the parasitic wasp Lariophagus distinguendus in an environment where host quality variesBehaviour, 100
J. Werren (1983)
A model for sex ratio selection in parasitic wasps: local mate competition and host quality effectsNetherlands Journal of Zoology, 34
J. Assem (1970)
Some Experiments On Sex Ratio and Sex Regulation in the Pteromalid Lariophagus DistinguendusNetherlands Journal of Zoology, 21
E. Charnov (1984)
The theory of sex allocation.Monographs in population biology, 18
L. Nunney, R. Luck (1988)
Factors influencing the optimum sex ratio in a structured population.Theoretical population biology, 33 1
F. Putters, J. Assem (1988)
The analysis of partial preferences in a parasitic waspAnimal Behaviour, 36
R. Green (1982)
Optimal foraging and sex ratio in parasitic waspsJournal of Theoretical Biology, 95
E. Charnov (1979)
The Genetical Evolution of Patterns of Sexuality: Darwinian FitnessThe American Naturalist, 113
E. Charnov, Hartogh Los-den, W. Jones, J. Assem (1981)
Sex ratio evolution in a variable environmentNature, 289
J. Werren (1980)
Sex Ratio Adaptations to Local Mate Competition in a Parasitic WaspScience, 208
F. Jachmann, J. Assem (1982)
The Coevolution of Receptivity Signalling and Body-Size Dimorphism in the ChalcidoideaBehaviour, 80
R. Kirkpatrick, D. Wilbur (1965)
The Development and Habits of the Granary Weevil, Sitophilus granarius within the Kernel of WheatJournal of Economic Entomology, 58
S. Barnett (1983)
The Extended PhenotypeInterdisciplinary Science Reviews, 8
D. Jackson (1969)
Observations on the female reproductive organs and the poison apparatus of Caraphractus cinctus Walker (Hymenoptera : Mymaridae)Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 48
IS BEING LARGE MORE IMPORTANT FOR FEMALE THAN FOR MALE PARASITIC WASPS? by J. VAN DEN ASSEM, J. J. A. VAN IERSEL and R. L. LOS-DEN HARTOGH1) (Zoological Laboratory, Division Ethology, University of Leiden, P.O.Box 9516, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands) (With 7 Figures) (Acc. -III-1988) Introduction Several species of parasitic wasps (Chalcidoidea) operate in a variable environment. The size of a wasp's offspring may vary as a function of the size of the host on which it developed. This is true for many species (e.,g. JACKSON, 1968; I?ISHI, 1970; van den ASSEM, 1971; Opp & LucK, 1986). Although the extremes do not differ very much, males are usually smaller than females, on average. These empirical data suggest that a larger size is more important to females than to males (CHARNOV, 1979). Being large or small may have consequences for the reproductive success, hence, for the fitness (i. e. the classical fitness, as defined by DAWKINS, 1982) of individual wasps, and the consequences may differ between the sexes. It is in this evolutionary context that the way in which ovipositing wasps invest in an environment where offspring fitness varies, opens up interesting perspectives. Theoretical models have been developed (by
Behaviour – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 1989
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.