Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Jensen, C. Moss, A. Surlykke (2005)
Echolocating bats can use acoustic landmarks for spatial orientationJournal of Experimental Biology, 208
D. Hartley (1992)
Stabilization of perceived echo amplitudes in echolocating bats. I. Echo detection and automatic gain control in the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus, and the fishing bat, Noctilio leporinus.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91 2
D. Griffin, A. Novick, M. Kornfield (1958)
THE SENSITIVITY OF ECHOLOCATION IN THE FRUIT BAT, ROUSETTUSThe Biological Bulletin, 115
J. Eklöf, T. Tranefors, L. Vázquez (2002)
Precedence of visual cues in the emballonurid bat Balantiopteryx plicataMammalian Biology, 67
Horst-Jürgen Herbert (1984)
Echoortungsverhalten des Flughundes Rousettus aegyptiacus (Megachiroptera), 50
R. Holland, D. Waters, J. Rayner (2004)
Echolocation signal structure in the Megachiropteran bat Rousettus aegyptiacus Geoffroy 1810Journal of Experimental Biology, 207
T. Perera (2004)
Fish can encode order in their spatial map.Proceedings of The Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 271
P. Höller, U. Schmidt (1996)
The orientation behaviour of the lesser spearnosed bat, Phyllostomus discolor (Chiroptera) in a model roostJournal of Comparative Physiology A, 179
E. Cockrum, D. Griffin (1958)
Listening in the Dark
G. Neuweiler, E. Covey (2000)
The biology of bats
R. Holland, P. Winter, D. Waters (2005)
Sensory systems and spatial memory in the fruit bat Rousettus aegyptiacusEthology, 111
A. Boonman, Gareth Jones (2002)
Intensity control during target approach in echolocating bats; stereotypical sensori-motor behaviour in Daubenton's bats, Myotis daubentonii.The Journal of experimental biology, 205 Pt 18
M. Fenton (1995)
Natural History and Biosonar Signals
The effect of familiarity on echolocation in the megachiropteran bat Rousettus aegyptiacus Richard A. Holland 1,2,3) & Dean A. Waters 2) ( 1 Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Department, Princeton University, Princeton, 08544-1003, USA; 2 Institute of Integrative and Comparative Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK) (Accepted: 14 June 2007) Summary Much is known about the way bats adjust their echolocation behaviour in response to environ- mental structure or to locate insect prey. By contrast, little is known about how echolocation calls are modulated in response to familiarity of the environment and objects within it. Here we show that the echolocating Megachiropteran bat Rousettus aegyptiacus produces echolo- cation signals at the same rate whether an obstacle is predictable or unpredictable in location, but that it has a reduced rate of echolocation signal production in a familiar environment with no obstacle present. This suggests that signal production is reduced in a familiar environment absent of ‘clutter’ but that probing the environment for maximum information is more im- portant for this species than minimizing any cost of probing the environment in a cluttered space. Keywords : echolocation, familiarity, Rousettus aegyptiacus , bats. Introduction All Microchiropteran and at least one Megachiropteran
Behaviour – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 2007
Keywords: ROUSETTUS AEGYPTIACUS; FAMILIARITY; ECHOLOCATION; BATS
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.