Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
THE INFINITIVE WITH TWO SUBSTANTIVAL ACCUSATIVES An Ambiguous Construction? by JEFFREY T. REED La Mirada, CA I. The Problem Stated After searching unsuccessfully in several Classical and New Testament Greek grammars for a rule to help solve an ambiguous construction in the infinitive, H.R. Moeller and A. Kramer developed their own rule that supposedly resolved the ambiguity.' 1 The problem they attempted to solve is found in a clause where the infinitive governs both a subject and object in the accusative case. In this construction, the subject and object cannot be determined by the inflectional forms. The effect of this type of ambiguity on exegesis is demonstrated in 2 Cor 2:13. Is it "When I went into Troas to proclaim the gospel of Christ and found that the Lord had opened a door for me, I had not peace in my spirit when I didn't find Titus" (NIV) or "when Titus didn't find me"? Even when looking at the surrounding context, it is possible to argue for the second reading. Moeller and Kramer's 1 See H.R. Moeller and A. Kramer, "An Overlooked Pattern in NT Greek," Nov T 5 (1962) 25-35, which is partially based, with further expansions,
Novum Testamentum – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 1991
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.