Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

"Etepon ▵e oYk Ei Mh Iak

"Etepon ▵e oYk Ei Mh Iak "ETEPON ▵ E OYK EI MH IAK A Note on Galatians i I9 BY L. PAUL TRUDINGER Arlington, Virginia Part of Paul's purpose in the second half of the first chapter of Galatians seems to be to establish his independence of those "who were apostles before him" (i 17). One of the critical problems raised in i ig is the question as to whether Paul is including James, the Lord's brother, amongst the apostles. Fr. JOHN BLiG?i has set out the alternative translations of i ig i). He allows of three possibilities. The first : "I saw none of the other apostles except James", as- sumes the apostleship of James without reserve. This BLIGH rejects and rightly so, I believe. This would certainly be an odd way for Paul to say that he saw only two apostles, Peter and James. Acts i 14 reflects a tradition in which the brothers of the Lord were distinguished from the apostles. The second alternative reads: "I saw none of the other apostles, but only James." here the si fL"1] loses its exceptive force and becomes merely a qualifying con- junction. This BLIGH also rejects, and again, I think, rightly, on the http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Novum Testamentum Brill

"Etepon ▵e oYk Ei Mh Iak

Trudinger, L. Paul
Novum Testamentum , Volume 17 (3): 200 – Jan 1, 1975
Download PDF
3 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/etepon-e-oyk-ei-mh-iak-28bhPxzo1E

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© 1975 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0048-1009
eISSN
1568-5365
DOI
10.1163/156853675X00176
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

"ETEPON ▵ E OYK EI MH IAK A Note on Galatians i I9 BY L. PAUL TRUDINGER Arlington, Virginia Part of Paul's purpose in the second half of the first chapter of Galatians seems to be to establish his independence of those "who were apostles before him" (i 17). One of the critical problems raised in i ig is the question as to whether Paul is including James, the Lord's brother, amongst the apostles. Fr. JOHN BLiG?i has set out the alternative translations of i ig i). He allows of three possibilities. The first : "I saw none of the other apostles except James", as- sumes the apostleship of James without reserve. This BLIGH rejects and rightly so, I believe. This would certainly be an odd way for Paul to say that he saw only two apostles, Peter and James. Acts i 14 reflects a tradition in which the brothers of the Lord were distinguished from the apostles. The second alternative reads: "I saw none of the other apostles, but only James." here the si fL"1] loses its exceptive force and becomes merely a qualifying con- junction. This BLIGH also rejects, and again, I think, rightly, on the

Journal

Novum Testamentum – Brill

Published: Jan 1, 1975

There are no references for this article.