Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
THE PAST PARTICIPLE OF SUBSEQUENT ACTION In Biblica 51 (1970) 235 f. I hope I proved the existence of a Greek "aorist participle of subsequent action." This construction, about which MOULTON had been sceptical, is important for Acts xvi 6 (xmxv01v<cq) and without it RAMSAY'S South Galatian theory, in which I firmly believe, runs into difficult waters. Although there are Latin parallels-using the perfect participle-I was at the time of writing that article unable to lay hands on a good example from the classical period. I think I can now supply one, from Pliny Natural History 8.185 : Germanici Caesayis manum aveysatus est haut multo postea extincti 1). Cf. also, in English, SHAKESPEARE, Antony and Cleopatra 3.6: "then does he say, he lent me some shipping unrestored." IIO Forter Hill Road, Bedford (England) G. M. LEE 1) H. RACKHAM (Loeb Classics) translates "it (i.e. a sacred ox) turned away from the hand of Germanicus Caesar, who was made away with not long after."
Novum Testamentum – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 1975
You can share this free article with as many people as you like with the url below! We hope you enjoy this feature!
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.