Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
SOME OBSERVATIONS ON THE SYNOPTIC PROBLEM AND THE USE OF STATISTICAL PROCEDURES BY JOHN J. O'ROURKE Philadelphia In attempts to provide a sounder basis for the solution of the Synoptic problem some scholars have sought to apply statistical methods to the Synoptic data. Here some observations will be made concerning certain of the attempts. The study of C. E. CARLSTON and D. NORLIN ') was based on a sampling of the material which they classified as triple tradi- tion and double tradition. Their purpose was to see how closely Lk. and Mt. correspond to one another when, according to the authors' hypothesis, Mt. and Lk. used Mk. However, they made a mistake in handling the material of the gospels when they assume that for statistical purposes one can consider equivalent words synonyms 2). It is not that their judgment is necessarily wrong when they so identify different words; rather there is no statistical control for such a judgment. Thus they find, for example, as common to both gospels twenty-one words in Mt. viii 2-4 and twenty-five in Lk. v i2b-I4, whereas in actual fact thirty-seven words in each passage are the same 3) ; in Mt. vi 25-33;
Novum Testamentum – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 1974
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.