Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

"Mulier Quae Damnavit, Salvavit"

"Mulier Quae Damnavit, Salvavit" I "Mulier Quae Damnavit, Salvavit" A Note on the Early Development of the Relatio simplex* C. H. KNEEPKENS 1. INTRODUCTION n the paragraph on the rapports of the relatives to their antecedents, of his Notices et extyaits,l Charles Thurot observed for the period from the late Antiquity until the middle of the twelfth century a servile following of the medieval grammarians of Priscian's doctrine on the relatives. Only in Peter Helias' Summa he noticed a first step on the path of independence: the division, not found in Priscian, of the relatio into the relation directa and the relatio indiyecta.2 A further stage of development Thurot found in the tracts dating from the middle of the thirteenth century: a systematical treatment of the relatio and the relatives in one section. In his Notices he printed an extensive fragment taken from the Summa de constyuctione of master Poncius the Provencal,3 later, in 1886, completely edited by Fierville.4 4 Poncius' section on the relatives (De relativis) 5 can be divided into two main parts: on the relatio and on the relatives. The paragraph on the relatio starts with a definition of the relatio, ascribed to Priscian: 'Relatio est, ut ait Priscianus, http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Vivarium Brill

"Mulier Quae Damnavit, Salvavit"

Kneepkens, C.H.
Vivarium , Volume 14 (1): 1 – Jan 1, 1976
Download PDF
25 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/mulier-quae-damnavit-salvavit-Is30x2creB

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© 1976 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0042-7543
eISSN
1568-5349
DOI
10.1163/156853476X00014
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

I "Mulier Quae Damnavit, Salvavit" A Note on the Early Development of the Relatio simplex* C. H. KNEEPKENS 1. INTRODUCTION n the paragraph on the rapports of the relatives to their antecedents, of his Notices et extyaits,l Charles Thurot observed for the period from the late Antiquity until the middle of the twelfth century a servile following of the medieval grammarians of Priscian's doctrine on the relatives. Only in Peter Helias' Summa he noticed a first step on the path of independence: the division, not found in Priscian, of the relatio into the relation directa and the relatio indiyecta.2 A further stage of development Thurot found in the tracts dating from the middle of the thirteenth century: a systematical treatment of the relatio and the relatives in one section. In his Notices he printed an extensive fragment taken from the Summa de constyuctione of master Poncius the Provencal,3 later, in 1886, completely edited by Fierville.4 4 Poncius' section on the relatives (De relativis) 5 can be divided into two main parts: on the relatio and on the relatives. The paragraph on the relatio starts with a definition of the relatio, ascribed to Priscian: 'Relatio est, ut ait Priscianus,

Journal

Vivarium – Brill

Published: Jan 1, 1976

There are no references for this article.