Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A Tiqqun Sopherim in Genesis Xvi 13B?

A Tiqqun Sopherim in Genesis Xvi 13B? 494 8 A. Herdner, Corpus des tablettes en cunéiformes alphabétiques (Paris, 1963) = CTA 5 [67] V: 19-21. P. J. van Zijl, Baal. A Study of Texts in Connection with Baal in the Ugaritic Epics (Neukirchen, 1972), p. 300, in his paragraph on "Terminology of Sexual Intercourse" does not mention š � ly; but, then, Baal is not the subject here. 9 After concluding this note, I discovered that both U. Cassuto, Biblical and Ca- naanite Literatures (Jerusalem, 1972), p. 239 (Heb.), and J. C. de Moor, The Seasonal Patterns in the Ugaritic Myth of Ba � lu (Neukirchen, 1971), p. 187, independently make passing reference to the linguistic relationship between the verse in Genesis and the Ugaritic passage. (The latter also refers to CAD for the Akkadian). Neither, however, noted that in all three languages the idiomatic usage is restricted to the animal world. 10 See the standard commentaries on Amos. 11 Randglossen zur Hebräischen Bibel 5 (Leipzig, 1912), p. 232. 12 Though the standard editions of this Midrash have the reading ¸sl and not ¸l, the interpretation remains the same. 13 See CAD, A, I, p. 321, 7', for the present citations as well as for http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Vetus Testamentum Brill

A Tiqqun Sopherim in Genesis Xvi 13B?

Vetus Testamentum , Volume 32 (4): 494 – Jan 1, 1982

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/a-tiqqun-sopherim-in-genesis-xvi-13b-i0w3ziIXiz

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© 1982 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0042-4935
eISSN
1568-5330
DOI
10.1163/156853382X00504
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

494 8 A. Herdner, Corpus des tablettes en cunéiformes alphabétiques (Paris, 1963) = CTA 5 [67] V: 19-21. P. J. van Zijl, Baal. A Study of Texts in Connection with Baal in the Ugaritic Epics (Neukirchen, 1972), p. 300, in his paragraph on "Terminology of Sexual Intercourse" does not mention š � ly; but, then, Baal is not the subject here. 9 After concluding this note, I discovered that both U. Cassuto, Biblical and Ca- naanite Literatures (Jerusalem, 1972), p. 239 (Heb.), and J. C. de Moor, The Seasonal Patterns in the Ugaritic Myth of Ba � lu (Neukirchen, 1971), p. 187, independently make passing reference to the linguistic relationship between the verse in Genesis and the Ugaritic passage. (The latter also refers to CAD for the Akkadian). Neither, however, noted that in all three languages the idiomatic usage is restricted to the animal world. 10 See the standard commentaries on Amos. 11 Randglossen zur Hebräischen Bibel 5 (Leipzig, 1912), p. 232. 12 Though the standard editions of this Midrash have the reading ¸sl and not ¸l, the interpretation remains the same. 13 See CAD, A, I, p. 321, 7', for the present citations as well as for

Journal

Vetus TestamentumBrill

Published: Jan 1, 1982

There are no references for this article.