Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
494 8 A. Herdner, Corpus des tablettes en cunéiformes alphabétiques (Paris, 1963) = CTA 5 [67] V: 19-21. P. J. van Zijl, Baal. A Study of Texts in Connection with Baal in the Ugaritic Epics (Neukirchen, 1972), p. 300, in his paragraph on "Terminology of Sexual Intercourse" does not mention š � ly; but, then, Baal is not the subject here. 9 After concluding this note, I discovered that both U. Cassuto, Biblical and Ca- naanite Literatures (Jerusalem, 1972), p. 239 (Heb.), and J. C. de Moor, The Seasonal Patterns in the Ugaritic Myth of Ba � lu (Neukirchen, 1971), p. 187, independently make passing reference to the linguistic relationship between the verse in Genesis and the Ugaritic passage. (The latter also refers to CAD for the Akkadian). Neither, however, noted that in all three languages the idiomatic usage is restricted to the animal world. 10 See the standard commentaries on Amos. 11 Randglossen zur Hebräischen Bibel 5 (Leipzig, 1912), p. 232. 12 Though the standard editions of this Midrash have the reading ¸sl and not ¸l, the interpretation remains the same. 13 See CAD, A, I, p. 321, 7', for the present citations as well as for
Vetus Testamentum – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 1982
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.