Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Zwei Kleine Beiträge Zum Verständnis Der Gottesreden Im Buch Ijob (Xxxviii 36 F., Xl 25)

Zwei Kleine Beiträge Zum Verständnis Der Gottesreden Im Buch Ijob (Xxxviii 36 F., Xl 25) 220 language and literature separately, but rather their common picture necessitates some literary relation between them. Jerusalem Yitshak Avishur 1) See H. L. Ginsberg, "The Ugaritic texts and textual criticism", JBL 62 (1943), pp. 109-15; M. Dahood, "The value of Ugaritic for textual criticism", Biblica 40 (1959), pp. 160-70; S. Segert, "The Ugaritic texts and the textual cri- ticism of the Hebrew Bible", H Goedicke (ed.), Near Eastern Studies in Honor of William Foxwell Albright (Baltimore and London, 1971), pp. 413-20; and see the detailed bibliography in my book Word Pairs in the Bible and in Ancient Semitic Literature (in the press). 2) Talmon, "On the emendation of biblical texts on the basis of Ugaritic parallels", H. L. Ginsberg Volume, Eretz-Israel 14 (1978), p. 119, n. 9 (Hebrew). 3) "The Ugaritic Parallel to Jeremiah 8:23", JNES 20 (1961), pp. 41-6. The close affinity of the verse in Jeremiah to the Keret text was pointed out earlier by Ginsberg and Cassuto: U. Cassuto, "Biblical and Canaanite Literature", in Biblical and Oriental Studies 2 (Jerusalem, 1975), p. 63; H. L. Ginsberg, The Legend of King Keret (New Haven, Conn., 1946), p. 45. 4) The text is quoted according to A. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Vetus Testamentum Brill

Zwei Kleine Beiträge Zum Verständnis Der Gottesreden Im Buch Ijob (Xxxviii 36 F., Xl 25)

Vetus Testamentum , Volume 31 (2): 220 – Jan 1, 1981

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/zwei-kleine-beitr-ge-zum-verst-ndnis-der-gottesreden-im-buch-ijob-43x5eBXz05

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© 1981 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0042-4935
eISSN
1568-5330
DOI
10.1163/156853381X00109
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

220 language and literature separately, but rather their common picture necessitates some literary relation between them. Jerusalem Yitshak Avishur 1) See H. L. Ginsberg, "The Ugaritic texts and textual criticism", JBL 62 (1943), pp. 109-15; M. Dahood, "The value of Ugaritic for textual criticism", Biblica 40 (1959), pp. 160-70; S. Segert, "The Ugaritic texts and the textual cri- ticism of the Hebrew Bible", H Goedicke (ed.), Near Eastern Studies in Honor of William Foxwell Albright (Baltimore and London, 1971), pp. 413-20; and see the detailed bibliography in my book Word Pairs in the Bible and in Ancient Semitic Literature (in the press). 2) Talmon, "On the emendation of biblical texts on the basis of Ugaritic parallels", H. L. Ginsberg Volume, Eretz-Israel 14 (1978), p. 119, n. 9 (Hebrew). 3) "The Ugaritic Parallel to Jeremiah 8:23", JNES 20 (1961), pp. 41-6. The close affinity of the verse in Jeremiah to the Keret text was pointed out earlier by Ginsberg and Cassuto: U. Cassuto, "Biblical and Canaanite Literature", in Biblical and Oriental Studies 2 (Jerusalem, 1975), p. 63; H. L. Ginsberg, The Legend of King Keret (New Haven, Conn., 1946), p. 45. 4) The text is quoted according to A.

Journal

Vetus TestamentumBrill

Published: Jan 1, 1981

There are no references for this article.