Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
SHORT NOTES ADDENDUM TO PROFESSOR MILLAR BURROW'S NOTE ON THE ASCENT FROM ACCHO IN 4QpIsaa. 1) Professor Millar BLTRROWS' interpretation of the suffix of is, of course, the natural one if the original meaning of Isaiah's words is followed in this peler. However, as he is aware, this cannot be presumed, having regard to the usual methods of interpretation practised by this Sect, and there is, at least, no necessity for the re- ference to be as the prophet clearly intended it. That understood, it remains to discover whether the context of the commentary itself will allow it. Bearing in mind the reference to the Davidic Prince in Frgt. A line 2 (allowing my reconstruction h'dh), we have a singular subject, with which the biblical text nicely conforms and which could most naturally be the reference of the singular suffix of Furthermore, the references to the enemies in Frgt. B are all plural, and it is not until we come to Frgt. D that a singular Magog makes an appearance. It is possible that the subject of the _peler changes from the nsy" h`dh before we encounter the Isaianic Enemy's Approach passage, but until some hint of this
Vetus Testamentum – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 1957
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.