Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Addendum To Professor Millar Burrow's Note On the Ascent From Accho in 4QpIsaa. 1)

Addendum To Professor Millar Burrow's Note On the Ascent From Accho in 4QpIsaa. 1) SHORT NOTES ADDENDUM TO PROFESSOR MILLAR BURROW'S NOTE ON THE ASCENT FROM ACCHO IN 4QpIsaa. 1) Professor Millar BLTRROWS' interpretation of the suffix of is, of course, the natural one if the original meaning of Isaiah's words is followed in this peler. However, as he is aware, this cannot be presumed, having regard to the usual methods of interpretation practised by this Sect, and there is, at least, no necessity for the re- ference to be as the prophet clearly intended it. That understood, it remains to discover whether the context of the commentary itself will allow it. Bearing in mind the reference to the Davidic Prince in Frgt. A line 2 (allowing my reconstruction h'dh), we have a singular subject, with which the biblical text nicely conforms and which could most naturally be the reference of the singular suffix of Furthermore, the references to the enemies in Frgt. B are all plural, and it is not until we come to Frgt. D that a singular Magog makes an appearance. It is possible that the subject of the _peler changes from the nsy" h`dh before we encounter the Isaianic Enemy's Approach passage, but until some hint of this http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Vetus Testamentum Brill

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/addendum-to-professor-millar-burrow-s-note-on-the-ascent-from-accho-in-yUhqz7cLcc

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© 1957 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0042-4935
eISSN
1568-5330
DOI
10.1163/156853357X00160
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

SHORT NOTES ADDENDUM TO PROFESSOR MILLAR BURROW'S NOTE ON THE ASCENT FROM ACCHO IN 4QpIsaa. 1) Professor Millar BLTRROWS' interpretation of the suffix of is, of course, the natural one if the original meaning of Isaiah's words is followed in this peler. However, as he is aware, this cannot be presumed, having regard to the usual methods of interpretation practised by this Sect, and there is, at least, no necessity for the re- ference to be as the prophet clearly intended it. That understood, it remains to discover whether the context of the commentary itself will allow it. Bearing in mind the reference to the Davidic Prince in Frgt. A line 2 (allowing my reconstruction h'dh), we have a singular subject, with which the biblical text nicely conforms and which could most naturally be the reference of the singular suffix of Furthermore, the references to the enemies in Frgt. B are all plural, and it is not until we come to Frgt. D that a singular Magog makes an appearance. It is possible that the subject of the _peler changes from the nsy" h`dh before we encounter the Isaianic Enemy's Approach passage, but until some hint of this

Journal

Vetus TestamentumBrill

Published: Jan 1, 1957

There are no references for this article.