Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
<jats:sec><jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>On the level of phenomena the observers of society have noticed an increase of polymorphism, of indeterminacy. This contingent society points us — theoretically and through our experience — to possibility and its (outer) limits. Contingency always means limitation, since possibility emerges only from its background and borderline: the impossible is the frame. And the task. The horizon shall be — Utopia: the sphere of imagination which belongs to the impossible but creates possibility. Since there is a greater truth than the truth of the factual and that is the reality of possibility. We are obliged to this reality: conflicting with the dictatorship of the factual.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
Asian Journal of Social Science – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 2009
Keywords: UTOPIA; MODERNISATION; ETHICS; JUSTICE; SOCIETY; CONTINGENCY
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.