Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The 'Third Man' Argument and Plato's Theory of Forms1

The 'Third Man' Argument and Plato's Theory of Forms1 50 The 'Third Man' Argument and Plato's Theory of Forms1 J. M. E. MORAVCSIK HE 'Third Man'-argument (Parmenides I32aI-b2) is one of the most controversial passages in Plato's dialogues. In recent years a number of new interpretations of this argument have appeared.2 These interpretations were designed to bring to bear upon the Platonic text the logical rigour and analytic acumen which are characteristic of con- temporary philosophy. Allegedly implicit premisses have been brought to light with the help of symbolic logic, and attempts have been made to relate the argument to the problem of change vs. constancy in Plato's metaphysical position. Though these interpretations contain much that is stimulating, each of them seems to have the shortcoming of re- presenting Plato as fairly simple-minded philosophically, 3 and of locating the complexity of thought in logical structure.4 Such accounts ascribe to Plato the kind of argument which is not typical of what we encounter in the dialogues. For in most of his writings Plato emphasizes philosophical depth, rather than formal complexity. Thus it is more plausible to suppose that the passage under consideration is fairly simple in its deductive form, and that it poses problems with serious metaphysical implications. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Phronesis Brill

The 'Third Man' Argument and Plato's Theory of Forms1

Phronesis , Volume 8 (1-2): 50 – Jan 1, 1963

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/the-third-man-argument-and-plato-s-theory-of-forms1-v7ln1Briuj

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© 1963 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0031-8868
eISSN
1568-5284
DOI
10.1163/156852863X00033
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

50 The 'Third Man' Argument and Plato's Theory of Forms1 J. M. E. MORAVCSIK HE 'Third Man'-argument (Parmenides I32aI-b2) is one of the most controversial passages in Plato's dialogues. In recent years a number of new interpretations of this argument have appeared.2 These interpretations were designed to bring to bear upon the Platonic text the logical rigour and analytic acumen which are characteristic of con- temporary philosophy. Allegedly implicit premisses have been brought to light with the help of symbolic logic, and attempts have been made to relate the argument to the problem of change vs. constancy in Plato's metaphysical position. Though these interpretations contain much that is stimulating, each of them seems to have the shortcoming of re- presenting Plato as fairly simple-minded philosophically, 3 and of locating the complexity of thought in logical structure.4 Such accounts ascribe to Plato the kind of argument which is not typical of what we encounter in the dialogues. For in most of his writings Plato emphasizes philosophical depth, rather than formal complexity. Thus it is more plausible to suppose that the passage under consideration is fairly simple in its deductive form, and that it poses problems with serious metaphysical implications.

Journal

PhronesisBrill

Published: Jan 1, 1963

There are no references for this article.