Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
421 2) E.g. in view of the subject matter of ch. XI it would have been revealing to mention the title of Wlosok's paper in Studia Patristica 4, viz. Zur Be- deutung der nichtcyprianischen Bibelzitate bei Laktanz. 3) P. 8o3 refers to R. Klibansky, Plato Latinus : Timaeus, i-xvii, when in fact Waszink's chapter De Calcidio on pp. IX-XVII of the Praefatio to his edition of Calcidius is meant. Besides, for Calcidius it would have been preferable to refer to Waszink's Nachtrag zum RAC in JbAC 15(1972), 236-44.-P. 82 n. 6 is very strange: there Von Arnim is censured for attri- buting S VF II (the number of the volume is not stated by O.) 623 to De Mundo. Von Arnim does nothing of the kind, he only incorporates this fragment in his ch. II of the Chrysippean fragments about Physics, a chapter called De mundo. DE NOVIS LIBRIS IUDICIA W. EVENEPOEL, Zakelijke en literaire ondeyzoekingen betreffende het Liber Cathemerinon van Aurelius Prudentius Clemens. Verhandeling Letteren van de Koninklijke Academie voor Wetenschappen, Letteren en Schone Kunsten van België, 41: 91. Brussel, Paleis der Academiën, 1979. 167 PP. Pr. 150 B.F. This book is a revised and greatly abridged
Mnemosyne – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 1982
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.