Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

TWO NOTES ON THE HISTORIA AUGUSTA

TWO NOTES ON THE HISTORIA AUGUSTA 586 MISCELLANEA or fatal, would give M. less cause to curse fate (vv. 7–8), for if Priscus were to meet his end, so would his patronage of M. M. is not concerned that Priscus’ pleasure would be entirely vicarious, only with de ecting him to a safer sport (he goes on to suggest boar-hunting, which he knows he already practises: M.12.1). O xford , Forest Hill OX 33 1EG P.T. E den TWO NOTES ON THE HISTORIA AUGUSTA trig. tyr. 22, 1-2 E t hoc familiare populi Aegyptiorum, ut vel furiosi ac dementes de levi mis quibus usque ad summa rei p. pericula perducantur: saepe illi ob neglectas salutationes . . . et cetera talia usque ad summum rei p. pericu- lum seditiones, ita ut armarentur contra eos exercitus, pervenerunt. Petschenig’s addition of in is not convincing, since it prevents usque ad sum- mum . . . periculum from depending on pervenerunt , with which it naturally belongs. Peter’s seditione is clumsy (the isolated ablative is badly placed within the sentence, and in the context it is unnecessary). The easiest cor- rection here is surely illi , which allows seditiones to be subject: consid- ered as a mechanical http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Mnemosyne Brill

TWO NOTES ON THE HISTORIA AUGUSTA

Mnemosyne , Volume 54 (5): 586 – Jan 1, 2001

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/two-notes-on-the-historia-augusta-uNYxpl8oE8

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© 2001 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0026-7074
eISSN
1568-525X
DOI
10.1163/15685250152909048
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

586 MISCELLANEA or fatal, would give M. less cause to curse fate (vv. 7–8), for if Priscus were to meet his end, so would his patronage of M. M. is not concerned that Priscus’ pleasure would be entirely vicarious, only with de ecting him to a safer sport (he goes on to suggest boar-hunting, which he knows he already practises: M.12.1). O xford , Forest Hill OX 33 1EG P.T. E den TWO NOTES ON THE HISTORIA AUGUSTA trig. tyr. 22, 1-2 E t hoc familiare populi Aegyptiorum, ut vel furiosi ac dementes de levi mis quibus usque ad summa rei p. pericula perducantur: saepe illi ob neglectas salutationes . . . et cetera talia usque ad summum rei p. pericu- lum seditiones, ita ut armarentur contra eos exercitus, pervenerunt. Petschenig’s addition of in is not convincing, since it prevents usque ad sum- mum . . . periculum from depending on pervenerunt , with which it naturally belongs. Peter’s seditione is clumsy (the isolated ablative is badly placed within the sentence, and in the context it is unnecessary). The easiest cor- rection here is surely illi , which allows seditiones to be subject: consid- ered as a mechanical

Journal

MnemosyneBrill

Published: Jan 1, 2001

There are no references for this article.