Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

THEME ISSUE: HADĪTH AND FIQH

THEME ISSUE: HADĪTH AND FIQH © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2001 Islamic Law and Society 8,3 THEME ISSUE: ¼ADÁTH AND FIQH GUEST EDITOR: SUSAN SPECTORSKY Joseph SchachtÕs outline of the relationship between ½adÂth and fiqh has dominated Western scholarship since the publication of his Th e Origins of Muhammadan Jurisprudence in 1950. Schacht, however, made no reference to several important ½adÂth collections and f iqh works that had not yet been published. For example, he ignored the mu × an na f s of ®Abd al-Razz¨q and Ibn Ab Shayba and gave only scant attention to the ½adÂth collections of Im¨m Sh®ism. With the publication of these and other texts, scholars have begun to re-examine the relationship between ½adÂth and fiqh and to move beyond SchachtÕs outline. Three of the four studies presented in this theme issue of ILS — Gautier JuynbollÕs, Christopher MelchertÕs and mine — are on ½adÂth and Sunn jurisprudence; Robert GleaveÕs is on ½adÂth and Im¨m jurisprudence. All of them incorporate sources that were not used by Schacht. In his earlier studies of ½ a d  t h criticism, Juynboll has taken SchachtÕs theory of the Òcommon linkÓ as a starting point. Here, in ÒReappraisal of Some Technica http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Islamic Law and Society Brill

THEME ISSUE: HADĪTH AND FIQH

Islamic Law and Society , Volume 8 (3): 299 – Jan 1, 2001

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/theme-issue-had-th-and-fiqh-bHAhBns3Pf

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© 2001 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0928-9380
eISSN
1568-5195
DOI
10.1163/156851901317230602
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

© Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2001 Islamic Law and Society 8,3 THEME ISSUE: ¼ADÁTH AND FIQH GUEST EDITOR: SUSAN SPECTORSKY Joseph SchachtÕs outline of the relationship between ½adÂth and fiqh has dominated Western scholarship since the publication of his Th e Origins of Muhammadan Jurisprudence in 1950. Schacht, however, made no reference to several important ½adÂth collections and f iqh works that had not yet been published. For example, he ignored the mu × an na f s of ®Abd al-Razz¨q and Ibn Ab Shayba and gave only scant attention to the ½adÂth collections of Im¨m Sh®ism. With the publication of these and other texts, scholars have begun to re-examine the relationship between ½adÂth and fiqh and to move beyond SchachtÕs outline. Three of the four studies presented in this theme issue of ILS — Gautier JuynbollÕs, Christopher MelchertÕs and mine — are on ½adÂth and Sunn jurisprudence; Robert GleaveÕs is on ½adÂth and Im¨m jurisprudence. All of them incorporate sources that were not used by Schacht. In his earlier studies of ½ a d  t h criticism, Juynboll has taken SchachtÕs theory of the Òcommon linkÓ as a starting point. Here, in ÒReappraisal of Some Technica

Journal

Islamic Law and SocietyBrill

Published: Jan 1, 2001

There are no references for this article.