Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/brill/revelation-regained-the-hermeneutics-of-and-in-the-temple-scroll-0uhDxSuLb0
References
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
- Publisher
- Brill
- Copyright
- © 2002 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
- ISSN
- 0929-0761
- eISSN
- 1568-5179
- DOI
- 10.1163/156851702320917841
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
* The authors wish to thank Ms Joyce Levitan for commenting on an earlier ver- sion of this manuscript, Ms Tasha Sanbower (MA, Hebrew University) for assistance in researching Appendix I, and Mr Douglas Dance (MA cand., University of Minne- sota) for patiently editing Appendix II. 1 Two works, in particular, have helped place the study of the orthography, phonol- ogy, morphology, and syntax of Qumran Hebrew on a solid foundation: E.Y. Kutscher, The Language and Linguistic Background of the Isaiah Scroll (1QIsa a ) (ed. E. Qimron; STDJ 6A; Leiden: Brill, 1979 2 ; Hebrew original, 1959); and E. Qimron, The Hebrew of the Dead Sea Scrolls (HSS 29; Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1986). REVELATION REGAINED: THE HERMENEUTICS OF AND IN THE TEMPLE SCROLL* BERNARD M. LEVINSON University of Minnesota and MOLLY M. ZAHN University of Oxford The frequent replacement of conditional , Òif,Ó with its semantic equivalent in the Temple Scroll has been well documented. The replacement occurs in some cases when the redactor incorporates bib- lical laws that employ to mark the Òif Ó clause, or protasis. A clear example is the Temple ScrollÕs reuse of DeuteronomyÕs law against apostasy. Figure 1 shows the substitution of
Journal
Dead Sea Discoveries – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 2002