Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Robinson, R. Lewicki, E. Donahue (2000)
Extending and testing a five factor model of ethical and unethical bargaining tactics: Introducing the SINS scale.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21
D. Forsyth (1980)
A taxonomy of ethical ideologies.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39
R. Lewicki (1982)
Ethical Concerns in Conflict Management
D. Forsyth, W. Pope (1984)
Ethical Ideology and Judgments of Social Psychological Research: Multidimensional AnalysisJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46
M. Rahim (1983)
Measurement of Organizational ConflictJournal of General Psychology, 109
K. Thomas, R. Kilmann (1978)
Comparison of Four Instruments Measuring Conflict BehaviorPsychological Reports, 42
M. Bazerman, R. Lewicki (1983)
Negotiating in Organizations
F. Brady, G. Wheeler (1996)
An empirical study of ethical predispositionsJournal of Business Ethics, 15
A. Abbott (1988)
The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor
B. McDowell (1991)
Ethical Conduct and the Professional's Dilemma: Choosing Between Service and Success
Leigh Thompson, R. Hastie (1990)
Social perception in negotiationOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47
D. Forsyth (1985)
Individual Differences in Information Integration During Moral JudgmentJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49
C. Provis (2000)
Ethics, Deception and Labor NegotiationJournal of Business Ethics, 28
D. Lax, James Sebenius (1987)
The Manager as Negotiator
William Ury (2019)
Getting to YesBoy on the Bridge
E. Aronson, T. Wilson, M. Brewer (1998)
Experimentation in social psychology.
D. Forsyth (1981)
Moral JudgmentPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7
H. Reitz, J. Wall, M. Love (1998)
Ethics in negotiation: Oil and water or good lubrication?Business Horizons, 41
R. Friedman, Debra Shapiro (1995)
Deception and mutual gains bargaining: Are they mutually exclusive?Negotiation Journal, 11
Linda Babcock, G. Loewenstein, S. Issacharoff, Colin Camerer (1995)
Biased Judgments of Fairness in BargainingThe American Economic Review, 85
Kimberly Wade-Benzoni, A. Tenbrunsel, M. Bazerman (1996)
Egocentric Interpretations of Fairness in Asymmetric, Environmental Social Dilemmas: Explaining Harvesting Behavior and the Role of CommunicationOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67
<jats:sec><jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Relationships between individuals' ethical orientations (classified on dimensions of idealism and relativism), their negotiation strategies, their views of ethically ``marginal'' tactics, and their outcomes in dyadic negotiation are examined. Results indicate a relationship between ethical orientation and negotiation strategy. Specifically, absolutists (high on idealism, low on relativism) tended to employ more assertive negotiation strategies than did those of other ethical orientations. Individuals in no one category of ethical ideology outperformed those in any other category in terms of integrativeness of agreements or outcomes. Absolutists viewed ethically questionable tactics as less acceptable, whereas subjectivists found them more acceptable. We found that individuals less accepting of questionable tactics (``lambs''), who negotiated against those more accepting of such tactics (``lions''), were able to achieve better outcomes and a greater percentage of joint outcomes.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
International Negotiation – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 2002
Keywords: negotiation; ethics; deceptive bargaining tactics; ethical ideologies
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.