Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A Miscarriage of History: Wencheng Gongzhu and Sino- Tibetan Historiography

A Miscarriage of History: Wencheng Gongzhu and Sino- Tibetan Historiography <jats:sec><jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>In this article, I examine how Wencheng Gonghzu, the Chinese consort to the first Tibetan emperor Songtsen Gampo, served as a contentious rhetorical site for Tibetan and Chinese historiographers for over 1,000 years. I argue present exile Tibetan and Chinese propaganda on such topics as Tibetan political, cultural, and hereditary independence from China is at least analogous and possibly influenced by historiographic traditions found in texts such as the <jats:italic>Tang Annals</jats:italic> and post-imperial Tibetan buddhist works like the <jats:italic>Vase-shaped Pillar Testament</jats:italic>. However, as Central Tibetan and Chinese historians used Wencheng to index the complex relationship between Tibet and China, eastern Tibetan historians preserved lesser-known, potentially subversive narratives of Wencheng's travels, especially regarding her possible love-affair with the Tibetan minister Gar Tongtsen and their illegitimate child. After briefly reviewing Central Tibetan and Chinese metanarratives, I focus on eastern Tibetan narratives, including the apparently lost <jats:italic>Secret Autobiography of Wencheng Gongzhu</jats:italic>, which I argue point to the former political autonomy and cultural hybridity of areas of eastern Tibet, especially Minyak and Powo. My investigation into Wencheng narratives from eastern Tibet demonstrates that her journey from China to Tibet should not be thought of as a mere liminal period of her life, but rather central to debates among Tibetans and Chinese regarding the politics of national unity (<jats:italic>minzu tuanjie</jats:italic>) and constructions of pan-Tibetan identity.</jats:p> </jats:sec> http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Inner Asia Brill

A Miscarriage of History: Wencheng Gongzhu and Sino- Tibetan Historiography

Inner Asia , Volume 13 (2): 26 – Jan 1, 2011

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/a-miscarriage-of-history-wencheng-gongzhu-and-sino-tibetan-123iciHbLl

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
Copyright © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
1464-8172
eISSN
2210-5018
DOI
10.1163/000000011799297663
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

<jats:sec><jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>In this article, I examine how Wencheng Gonghzu, the Chinese consort to the first Tibetan emperor Songtsen Gampo, served as a contentious rhetorical site for Tibetan and Chinese historiographers for over 1,000 years. I argue present exile Tibetan and Chinese propaganda on such topics as Tibetan political, cultural, and hereditary independence from China is at least analogous and possibly influenced by historiographic traditions found in texts such as the <jats:italic>Tang Annals</jats:italic> and post-imperial Tibetan buddhist works like the <jats:italic>Vase-shaped Pillar Testament</jats:italic>. However, as Central Tibetan and Chinese historians used Wencheng to index the complex relationship between Tibet and China, eastern Tibetan historians preserved lesser-known, potentially subversive narratives of Wencheng's travels, especially regarding her possible love-affair with the Tibetan minister Gar Tongtsen and their illegitimate child. After briefly reviewing Central Tibetan and Chinese metanarratives, I focus on eastern Tibetan narratives, including the apparently lost <jats:italic>Secret Autobiography of Wencheng Gongzhu</jats:italic>, which I argue point to the former political autonomy and cultural hybridity of areas of eastern Tibet, especially Minyak and Powo. My investigation into Wencheng narratives from eastern Tibet demonstrates that her journey from China to Tibet should not be thought of as a mere liminal period of her life, but rather central to debates among Tibetans and Chinese regarding the politics of national unity (<jats:italic>minzu tuanjie</jats:italic>) and constructions of pan-Tibetan identity.</jats:p> </jats:sec>

Journal

Inner AsiaBrill

Published: Jan 1, 2011

Keywords: CHINA; TIBET; HISTORIOGRAPHY; HYBRIDITY; WENCHENG

There are no references for this article.