Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Gajanana Balakrishna Palsule (1972)
Pāṇini's Treatment of Tense and Mood FormationsCenter of Advanced Study in Sanskrit, Studies (E), 1
Louis Renou (1960)
La théorie des temps du verbe d'après les grammariens sanskritsJournal Asiatique, 248
William Dwight Whitney (1893)
The Veda in PāṇiniGiornale della Societā Asiatica Italiana, 7
Alexander Lubotsky (1997)
A R̥gvedic Word Concordance. 2 Parts. American Oriental Series 82
D. N. Shastri (1974)
Śri – cārudeva– śāstry– abhinanda–granthaḥ [Charudeva Shastri felicitation volume]
J. Bronkhorst (1981)
The orthoepic diaskeuasis of the $$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{R}$$ gveda and the date of Pā $$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n}$$ iniIndo-Iranian Journal, 23
F.B.J. Kuiper (1965)
Review of Bhawe 1957–1962IIJ, 8
B. Nooten (1967)
Panini's Replacement Technique and the Active Finite VerbLanguage, 43
Wolfgang Schmid, J. Becker, Eckhard Eggers, J. Udolph, D. Weber (1994)
Zum Problem kr̟nóti – karoti
J. Bronkhorst (1981)
The orthoepic diaskeuasis of the gveda and the date of PāiniIndo-Iranian Journal, 23
Jayamanta Mishra (1994)
Cultura Indica, Tributes to an Indologist: Professor Dr. Asoke Chatterjee Sastri
Siddheshwar Varma (1950–1951)
The Vedic Accent and the Interpreters of PāṇiniJournal of the Bombay Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, new series, 26
Sureshachandra Dnyaneshwar Laddu (1971)
Ancient Sanskrit Grammarians and the Literary RecordsVishveshvaranand Indological Journal, Hoshiarpur, 9
Rama Nath Sharma (1987–2003)
The Ashṭādhyāyī of Pāṇini. 6 vols
William Dwight Whitney (1893)
On Recent Studies in Hindu GrammarAmerican Journal of Philology, 14
Anjanī Kumārī (1990–1991)
leṭ lakāra: eka vivecanaKurukshetra University Research Journal: Arts and Humanities, 24–25
Gajanana Balakrishna Palsule (1991)
Panels of the VIIth World Sanskrit Conference, Vol. V, Pāṇini and the Veda
M. Deshpande, P. Kiparsky, S. Joshi (1984)
Pāṇini as a variationistLanguage, 60
B. Liebich
Panini : ein beitrag zur Kenntnis der indischen Literatur und Grammatik
Deo Prakash Patanjal (1963)
A Critical Study of R̥gveda (1.137–163), particularly from the Point of View of Pāṇinian Grammar
G. Cardona, Pāṇini (1988)
Pāṇini, his work and its traditions
P. Thieme (1935)
Pāṇini and the Veda : studies in the early history of linguistic science in India
B. K. Shivaramaiah (1969)
A Note on ‘Bahulaṁ Chandasi’Mysore Orientalist, 2
K. Hoffmann (1967)
Der Injunktiv im Veda : eine synchronische Funktionsuntersuchung
Iśvara Śarma (1994)
Siddhāntakaumudī vaidikī-prakriyā: eka samīkṣātmaka adhyayana [Pāṇini's Vedic rules in the Siddhānta Kaumudī]
Bhaṭṭojī Dīkṣita, B. Bhattacharya (1986)
Vedic grammar : text, English translation, Sanskrit exposition, and exhaustive grammatical notes with illustrations = Vaidikavyākaraṇam : Bhaṭṭojīdīkṣitaviracitā Vaidikī prakriyā
Sureshachandra Dnyaneshwar Laddu (1972)
The Device of Contiguity as a Key to Interpreting Pāṇini's rulesCenter of Advanced Study in Sanskrit, Studies (E), 1
PETER M. SCHARF PA NINIAN ACCOUNTS OF THE VEDIC SUBJUNCTIVE: LE T KR NVAI 0 TE SUMMARY To determine which Vedic texts Pa nini knew requires a comprehensive ap- proach that establishes a high correlation between the complete set of linguistic traits his treatise describes and the complete set of linguistic traits exhibited in each text in question. The examination of individual linguistic traits is in- adequate to determine which texts he knew because neither the Vedic nor the grammatical tradition is uniform and static. Bronkhorst (1991: 75) calls into question the assumption that Vedic texts were known to Pa nini in the form we have received them, while Cardona (1991: 130) shows that Pa nini ’s silence concerning certain Vedic forms may be due to deference to certain received exegetical traditions. The current paper considers a case where the Pa ninian grammatical tradition entertains disagreement over the derivation of obscure forms. Doubt concerning the recurrence of the term pit (3.4.92) into 3.4.94 brings into question whether Pa nini systematically accounts for stem strength- ening in the present subjunctive. Ka ¯ tya ¯ yana, Patan˜ jali, Jaya ¯ ditya, and Jinendra- buddhi remain silent on the point. Ra
Indo-Iranian Journal – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 2005
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.